Chú thích Khoảng cách hợp lý

Chú giải

  1. "The proof that Nixon and Kissinger timed military withdrawal to the 1972 election and negotiated a “decent interval” comes from extraordinarily rich and undeniable sources—the Nixon tapes and the near-verbatim transcripts that NSC aides made of negotiations with foreign leaders."
  2. "the normal human reluctance to produce self-incriminating evidence"
  3. "What we can then tell the South Vietnamese—they’ve got a year without war to build up."
  4. "We can’t have it knocked over—brutally—to put it brutally—before the election"
  5. "a plan in which we will withdraw all of our forces from Vietnam on a schedule in accordance with our program, as the South Vietnamese become strong enough to defend their own freedom"
  6. "fraud"
  7. "If the government is as unpopular as you seem to think, then the quicker our forces are withdrawn, the quicker it will be overthrown. And if it is overthrown after we withdraw, we will not intervene."
  8. "I think we could take, in my view, almost anything, frankly, that we can force on Thieu. South Vietnam probably can never even survive anyway."
  9. "We’ve got to find some formula that holds the thing together a year or two."
  10. "I also think that Thieu is right, that our terms will eventually destroy him."
  11. "the leading scholar of the 'decent interval'"
  12. "By 1971 [Kissinger] and Nixon would accept a 'decent interval' between U.S. disengagement and a North Vietnamese takeover in the south. Secret talks with Hanoi would allow Kissinger to manage this process, preserving the image of American strength and credibility."
  13. "Nor is it correct that all we sought was a 'decent interval' before a final collapse of Saigon. All of us who negotiated the agreement of October 12 were convinced that we had vindicated the anguish of a decade not by a 'decent interval' but by a decent settlement."
  14. "at times they speak of desiring no interval at all other than the duration necessary to quickly withdraw troops and POWs"
  15. "the tenor and content of their discussions seems much closer to support for the idea of a decent interval theory"
  16. "scholars [who] argue that Nixon and Kissinger’s strategy in Vietnam was never more than securing a ‘decent interval'"
  17. "simultaneously maintained a Plan A of further supporting Saigon and a Plan B of shielding Washington should their maneuvers prove futile."
  18. "largely misrepresented"
  19. "sought to gain time, make the North turn inward, and create a perpetual equilibrium"

Tham khảo

  1. “Richard Nixon and Henry A. Kissinger on ngày 6 tháng 10 năm 1972”. Presidential Recordings Digital Edition. University of Virginia. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 9 năm 2020. 
  2. Hanhimäki 2003, tr. 165.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHanhimäki2003 (trợ giúp)
  3. 1 2 3 Berman, Larry (ngày 12 tháng 8 năm 2001). “'No Peace, No Honor: Nixon, Kissinger, and Betrayal in Vietnam'”. The New York Times. Truy cập ngày 1 tháng 9 năm 2020. 
  4. 1 2 Hughes 2015, tr. 126.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  5. 1 2 Hughes 2015, tr. 9.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  6. 1 2 Hughes 2015, tr. 125.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  7. Snepp 1978, tr. 578–580.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFSnepp1978 (trợ giúp)
  8. Snepp 1978, tr. 565–567.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFSnepp1978 (trợ giúp)
  9. 1 2 3 4 Hughes 2015, tr. 120.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  10. Hughes 2015, tr. 121, 124.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  11. 1 2 3 Hughes 2015, tr. 121.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  12. 1 2 Hughes 2015, tr. 118.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  13. Hughes 2015, tr. 123.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  14. Hughes 2015, tr. 123–124.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  15. Wirtz, James J. (2007). “Jeffrey Kimball, The Vietnam War Files: Uncovering the Secret History of Nixon-Era Strategy”. Journal of Cold War Studies 9 (1): 117–118. doi:10.1162/jcws.2007.9.1.117
  16. 1 2 Nichter, Luke (2015). “Nichter on Burr and Kimball, 'Nixon's Nuclear Specter: The Secret Alert of 1969, Madman Diplomacy, and the Vietnam War'”. H-Net
  17. 1 2 Hughes 2015, tr. 124.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  18. Hughes 2015, tr. 126–127.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  19. Hanhimäki 2003, tr. 159.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHanhimäki2003 (trợ giúp)
  20. Hughes 2015, tr. 127.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFHughes2015 (trợ giúp)
  21. Yusuke, Tega (2012). “The Sino-US-Soviet Triangular Diplomacy and the Vietnam Peace Negotiations, 1971–1973: Between “Peace with Honor” and “Decent Interval””. The Frontier of International Relations (168): 117–130. doi:10.11375/kokusaiseiji.168_117
  22. Kadura 2016, tr. 4, 153.Lỗi sfn: không có mục tiêu: CITEREFKadura2016 (trợ giúp)